Seems the world is going even more urban. I just read that 55% of the entire world’s population now lives in large cities. By 2050, they project it will be 65%.
Chongquin, China (the sprawl formerly known as ChunKing) is home to something like 38M people or the same number of people as the second largest country on earth – Canada. Greater Tokyo is the largest urban centre at something like 40M. And I am not so sure from the reports that small towns are even counted. Maybe, if they did count them, the percentage of ‘urbanized’ people would be even higher.
The point? Well, maybe there is no point but what does urbanize mean to an individual?
Basically, people first went urban to work and swim in the gene pool but, of course, once there, people tend to stay. Repeat that for a few dozen generations and voila! Cities!!
But back to what urbanization means today. Firstly, it is now synonymous with dependent. Highrise folks do not grow, gather or hunt their own food. Nor do they harvest their own water, deal with their own waste or even fix their own homes. Being urban DOES NOT MEAN weak and useless but it seems to be a place that the weak and useless can thrive and the strong and skilled just go to the gym.
Urban also means something close to defenseless. Urbanites rely almost entirely on police and firefighters, doctors and ambulance drivers to ‘keep them safe’. OK, they also use insurance companies, rules and regulations. And lots of controls. But, generally speaking, a deeply rooted urbanite cannot protect their own budgie from their neighbour’s cat.
Urbanization also concentrates people. That makes them easier targets. Maybe they are NOT consciously targeted because of their density but wars seem to do that every now and then and, when that happens, it is absolutely intentionally. And epidemics and viruses do that naturally. Hell, even a bad urban fire includes way more than just the site of where the fire started.
Urbanization also, ironically, mentally isolates some, if not many. In Britain they have declared an epidemic of loneliness. Seems too many old people live alone and are isolated. And that causes health problems emphasizing mental health problems. Even the homeless feel better and safer in tent cities and groups. So, once you go broke, addicted and nuts, you finally have a (growing) peer group and are not lonely.
Part of isolation, of course, is the kind of work done in cities. Specialization puts space between the janitor and the surgeon, the lawyer and the mechanic. Specialization is a barrier to socialization. Specialization, status-defined neighbourhoods and commuting, mass transit and BIG BOX stores makes social interaction hurried and short if there is any at all. Hard to make friends at a Costco.
Readers know I have this bias. I think you are much healthier away from cities and the most I will concede as a compromise is very small towns. I actually think very small towns are probably the best – better than living isolated and remote – especially as you age. There are enough ‘comforts and services’ for the inadequately-abled but getting to know people from all walks of life is easier and inevitable. A town of 5 to 10,000 feels about right to me. But, to be fair, I am mostly just guessing.
“Dave, what’s your point?” We, as a species, are not being raised, bred, supported, trained, encouraged or even offered a path of being independently able or skilled. We are being programmed to work and live in an artificial society that leaves the majority of people entirely dependent. This is not a recipe for survival of the individual although it does serve the ‘system’ or the ‘machine’ or Big Brother. We have seemingly willingly joined a group ultimately destined for exploitation and then disposal. We are not able to survive in most threatening scenarios and many of those are looming up in the near or middle-distance future.
None of that bodes well.
More doom and gloom? I suppose so (apologies) …but I do not mean it that way. I am just trying to say out loud what maybe still needs saying. You know? Stating the obvious.
“So, what is that?”
Well now, that would be: Get out! GET OUT NOW!!! For most people (and, in ten years, probably Sal and me, too) that will mean a small town.
I agree on most points
But your definition of a small town seems a bit too big for me
Yes, you would need a town of about 5 to 10.000 people to have access to some comfort (like sufficient shops, a doctor,…)
But a town that size is already a bit too big for a lot of socializing
We live in a town of about that size
Very nice place to live in, we have all we need as far as shops and health care is concerned
And though the local butcher and bakery allows me to have small talk with the locals from time to time, it still is on the edge to really get to know the community
That we will see the % of people living in cities going up in the coming decades does not surprise me.
We have a whole generation growing up that seems to be glued to their smartphones and has absolutely no clue how to take care of themselves, have little or no social skills, do not like manual labour, do not have the faintest clue how to grow things or fish or hunt or defend themselves
They will have no other choice then to live in the cities, where hopefully the “system”will take care of them
But for the “sytem” to keepfunctioning (and it is already malfunctioning as we speak), the system requires input, like work, taxes being paid,….or the system will collapse (as it is already collapsing as we speak)
So I do not see a bright future ahead
LikeLike
I visited some relatives on Prince Edward Island and the small town they live in is 2500 people.
It has a small emergency clinic.
A large grocery store. A few gas stations and banks.
People can still be anonymous if they wish but everyone gossips.
A good place to retire and or maybe raise children.
Very small town minded but they are being yanked into the 21st century…..
There is quite a cosmopolitan surge of immigration.
There are Mennonite farmers in horse and buggy beside Buddhists in the grocery store.
A bit unusual to see.
But thats Canada.
LikeLike
I agree. Village size of 5-10K is a bit large. Mind you, my perspective is warped. NonCons 2500 sounds good. And I really agree with the vast portion of modern society being vulnerable and incapable of caring for themselves. Sal did not seek medical attention. “Why would I? It’s just a lot of bruising. They are not going to DO anything. I can heal at home.” And that is our norm, nowadays.
LikeLike
Fires at Bold Point Road and Surge Narrows Road?
Is it windy up there?
Its getting windy here.
LikeLike
Yeah. It was windy when it started, too. That’s why it got so out of hand. A dead tree was blown down over BC Hydro lines. Big flash. Then the fire. Road closed. Peeps evacuated. Crew got in fast. It is now contained but still burning.
LikeLike