We’ve been here seven years! First two were spent in the 12 x 16 boat shed (our accommodation while we built) and the last five years in the BIG house.
All the systems but one are in and working. The lower funicular is still outstanding and is now pressing as well. Gotta get on that. The rest of the infrastructure has been functioning well for at least three of those five years, maybe four. We have even caught up with the woodpile, an inanimate foe that beat us every year until last year and now hasn’t a chance as we are two years to the good already and relentless in our pursuit of more wood.
We are, for the most part, established. And yet, it still feels like yesterday. It is that sense of novelty, I hope, we don’t ever lose.
Part of the reason for that sense of ‘not knowing what’s next’ is that we did not do everything right the first time. So work on the systems – even though they are functioning – continues. The theory was (and still is) we don’t know how to do it right so let’s get it done quickly first and then we’ll ‘do it right’ when we inevitably have to fix it. It was because of that expedient approach to building that we finished in a mere two years of work.
Smart, skilled people who do things right, take longer. A friend of mine who can and does everything and does it well didn’t move in to the real house he was building for 14 or 15 years! Given that he didn’t start until he was almost fifty, it has been a long, hard slog. Still, the place is magnificent. A marvel of off-the-grid living. I just don’t have the patience.
And therein lies the point of today’s entry: are you a builder or a user?
We used to live on sailboats as most of you know. Lived on the water for 11 of the best years of our life. Still have lifelong friends from that time and priceless memories not to mention volumes of stories. It was a good time. But one thing we noticed early on – there were those who lived on boats they were also building (usually in situ) and there were those who lived on boats made by someone else (usually a commercial venture) and who went sailing on the weekends. We were in the latter category.
Those who were builders were not as a rule sailors, although there are some notable exceptions (T&J sailed the South Pacific twice!). And those who were sailors were not usually builders although everyone had to be ‘fixers’ and maintenance people. I would make some convincing arguments for being a buyer/sailor over a builder but, of course, it is a matter of opinion.
Living off the grid is not too dissimilar. There are those who build their own (the vast majority) and those who build big and beautiful and with all the toys using contractors or others to do the actual construction. The time-to-use difference favours the buyer and the financial difference, of course, the builder. Oddly, I would argue in favour of building your own in this case. Building is where the fun is. It is such an interesting learning curve and very satisfying when you get competent (or so I am told by those encouraging me to keep trying).
But I would actually promote a different approach altogether if you are over 55. I think most people over 55 (unless already well experienced in building) will simply have too hard a time or it will take too long to undertake a conventional cabin building. And I think most of us would find it difficult financially to buy a nice place off-the-grid and off-the-shelf, as it were. All systems ‘go’ from the start. I think we need a concept that is somewhere in between.
Kit homes are the first step to addressing that. The design is done for you and so are all the materials supplied. You have to do the cutting and assembling but the first steps are handled and handled properly. That’s good. But I don’t think good enough.
Half-built seems to be the next step some people adopt. They build to lock-up, declare it a work-in-progress and the cabin walls display bare ply and tar paper for awhile. Sometimes a long while. And, for those who are summer dwellers, that works fine. Who cares what it looks like?
But I think the best way would be to employ custom-built (built in the city where the labour and materials are cheaper and plentiful) shipping containers with supplemental yurts, canvas, tarps, arbors and plenty of decks. Then add some more decks.
This pre-fab-plus-summer-infrastructure-style has been enjoyed previously except the resident usually places a semi-retired RV or mobile home in place of the custom-built container. That old plan is perfectly fine but RV/trailer construction is poor. Containers are forever. And, anyway, I would want my own design. For me, shipping containers are the most logical way to go and the further out you are, the more logical they become.
Such a container-based plan is cheaper, easier and quicker to deploy. It would be ‘custom’ to your tastes within obvious restrictions. It is also ‘secure’ and perfect for as long as 8 months of the year. One could even make it comfortable year ’round with a small addition.
If I had to do it again, especially at this age, I would seriously consider that plan-concept.