Back in the loop!

Boy!  Have you guys been out of it or what?  All sorts of news to report! 

Firstly, there’s the ‘story’ of Sal’s outboard motor: As you know, I need a new motor so I’ve been looking.  ‘Course, when you look, you sometimes see other things.  And I saw a small 15hp Suzuki motor on Craigslist that was on the way to my brother’s Boxing Day dinner.  Sal’s current motor is a 1980’s 9.9hp longshaft on an 11 foot Whaler.  Which means that she is adequately powered but with too much ‘shaft’ in the water which slows her down (and makes the lower-hung engine more vulnerable to debris).  Plus it is old.  Plus it is a two-stroke.  So, on a whim, we went to see the Suzi. 

Aannnnndddd……………we bought it! “Merry Christmas, Sal.  Surprise!”  She was stunned. 

Anyway, we get home over the next few days and the next day I stay back at the house getting the systems up and running while Sal goes over in her boat to start unloading the 700 or so pounds of luggage and food to bring over.  She does it all in one trip except for her new motor which she leaves in the truck. 

And she then heads out.  Then I get a call on the walki-talkie; “Something went clunk and when I looked over the side, I saw half the engine hanging loose in the water.”  I took John’s boat (mine is on the hard and dry without an engine) and went to get her.  She had hit a deadhead and tore her motor in half.  So we went back to the truck and swapped engines.  She buzzed home all nonchalant-like with her new Suzi doing the work. 

Moral of the story: timing is everything.

Second moral: try not to be reduced to one old motor when it is -5 outside and you are working on the water.

Third moral: God watches out for the fools.  And we give thanks for that.   

Keeping it real

I tend to write mostly in what I consider to be a ‘witty’ style or, alternatively and more frequently, in the ‘reporting’, informational style.  You know: ‘we did this and we did that‘ kinda thing.

Reporting facts is kind of a drag but that was the blog exercise purpose when I started, keeping a journal of sorts.  So I do that.  Witty is, of course, in the ear of the beholder and I may fall somewhat short in that department now and again.  Sorry.  But I figure if Sal laughs, I achieved an acceptable level.  She’s my editor.  If she is pleased, I am pleased.  

I tend to let my political self out of the bag at times but politics and preaching and philosophizing are the 3 silent ‘P’s’ in boredom so I try to keep it to a minimum. Plus I don’t really know what the hell I am talking about most of the time so it is getting easier to cut back on the rants.  I’m even quieter in person these past few years but my reputation defies the facts on that score and I am still being accused of dominating conversations I have not even participated in. 

On a relevant tangent: I am appalled at my reputation as presented by my kids.  Whenever my son, B, introduces me to a young female friend of his, he first warns them about me.  “Be careful around my dad.  I am not responsible for him.  I am not even sure he’s my biological dad!  He’s crazy.  He may ask you your bra size or what sexual proclivities you have.  He’s not above asking about bowel regularity.  Or politics.  He’ll ask about your relationships, what you think, what you believe in and how attracted to him are you?  There are no good answers to that, by the way.  Just smile and try to leave the room.  Whatever you do, don’t answer any questions.  None!  It just encourages him!” 

I honestly do not think I warrant that kind of ‘safety’ warning.  OK, maybe a small ‘heads up’ kinda thing but, really, I am not a bad person.  I am basically a nice guy.  And, anyway, isn’t it time that bowel health came out of the closet?    

 

T-trot 3

Family dinner.  S’s side.  Very nice.  These Xmas dinners are very nostalgic, really.  Each one is like the last one only the kids are growing and the uncles are growing fat.  Same egg-nog, same dressing, same desserts.

Much the same conversation, too, only that the ‘kids’ play larger roles and talk about things that the older people either can’t hear or don’t understand.  Doesn’t seem to matter.  The smiling and laughter levels are the same.

One uncle is a sheet metal worker and quite talented at it.  He gives me sheet metal tubes for Xmas.  To most people, this would seem odd but, when one is living on an island, sheet metal tubes are pretty handy.  I like T’s Xmas presents.   The last one was a six inch tube that ‘morphs’ into three lesser tubes.  Hard to beat that!

The whole bunch shows up again the next day for brunch!  Two houses.  Two huge meals.  Same conversations.  And we get to do it all again next year!  It may seem as if I am really a smidge blasé about this ritual but, with my growing existential angst syndrome, I realize that I need it.  It is reassuring.  Like having a hard copy in the files.  If I wasn’t so sure that I existed last night, I will be made to feel as if I might by the end of brunch today.  By the end of the fourth leg of the Turkey trot series held tomorrow night at my brothers, I will be sure of my existence.

I think.

TT 2

Had dinner with an old friend of 35 years.  But, he and his wife, it seems, have to remain anonymous.  No one can know the facts of the case.  It’s a blog rule. 

This blog protocol requirement, however, is having the unintended effect of making me doubt the incident altogether!  I have an existential issue at the best of times (’cause no one writes!) and dropping the ‘facts’ from my (alleged) experiences is aggravating it.  Did I really have dinner with Friend 35?

If I did, it was very nice.  F35 and W35 (Mark ll) are wonderful people and we are very, very fond of them.  Not so much, however, their neighbours, N1 and N2.  Actually, N1 was a nice guy but N2 bugged the hell out of me.  “Ooh, we were at our cabin once and the power went off.  Well, how can one have coffee, then?  We had to leave.  I told N1 right then, ‘we have to leave on the very next ferry.  This is too hard!’.  Hee hee hee.”   I mumbled under my breath, “Sal can take you with one hand tied behind her back and blindfolded.  She’d mop the floor with you!”

But I didn’t share that message with anyone.  It seemed kind of infantile.  Not totally infantile.  Just a bit. 

But, maybe it never happened, eh?

It is, apparently, bad internet manners to mention real names in real places at real times since there are ‘machines and people out there’ that can and do use that kind of information to identify and target you for identity theft and data exploitation.  B told me so in no uncertain terms.  At least I think he did.  I’m not certain.  I could cell-phone B and check but it seems that there are also men and machines out there who monitor cell phones so, for them, my confirming of any facts is just doing their work for them.

I might change his name to A because I still love him and don’t want to take any chances. 

I’ll just have to leave the incident as probable but unprovable.

I thought that I could confirm my existence with some photographs but it was pointed out that, with the use of Photoshop’, I can be placed anywhere in any picture and at any time.  So, that’s out as a source of evidence but it has suggested a few new fantasies. 

We live in interesting times. The only thing that is clear to me is: any lies can be proven but the truth cannot.  Is it any wonder I have a growing sense of existential angst?

In the meantime, Merry Xmas (so that is where the X comes from – hiding JC’s identity)

   

Turkey Trot – part 1

Hit a milestone last night.  At least a speed bump on the highway of life.  Ben and his partner, K, hosted a Xmas dinner complete with eggnog, shortbread and mashed potatoes.  Kinda like old times but with the rookies in the kitchen.  Pretty neat.  They did good.

I suppose the speed bump was elevated to milestone status by the fact that K invited her family and so did Ben.  Two sets of moms and dads, one set of grandparents and a bunch o siblings in a ‘pair’ tree (they came in couples).  Plus a good friend or two – RC and Steve (his cat).  The dinner went nuclear in the family sense.

This is a good sign for their relationship.  And, I suppose, for ours – given that we all got this far and all.  Father ll and Mother ll are our parental-role counterparts.  Sal is still the cutest.  I am still the most homely.  We have a few more miles on the odometer but they are right behind us.

It’s weird.  Someday Ben might call another woman, ‘Mom’.  Someday, K may stop teasing me.  Family, eh?   

We all sat down to dinner like we had done it many times before.  Despite the healthy level of ‘awareness’ of each other as ‘the-potential-in-laws’, we managed to get along just fine and found a surprising level of enjoyment and comfort in the evening.  It was a ‘natural’ affair.

It seems the same level of madness and character that permeates Sal and my family is countered nicely by the personalities of the ‘other’ clan.  In fact, as much as I hate to admit it, the balance point is clearly with Ben and K.  Usually, I am the most sane person in any given gathering (as you know) but this time the ‘kids’ had it all together and dinner was delicious, the company fun and entertaining and no one asked me to leave early.  It doesn’t get any better than that.

I am not so sure that one dinner completes the passing of the torch but it was definitely a treat to enjoy the evening and not have to clean up afterwards.  And it was especially fun to leave the dishes with Ben.  I am sure that he has done dishes in his lifetime.  Pretty sure, anyway.  He lived as a separate being (eventually becoming an adult at some undetermined point in time that we refer to as the Basement Suite period) and so I know he knows how.  It is just that I have never seen it.

To be fair, I still haven’t.  Since K’s sister, S and Roz (sis-in-law and grandma) were willing to do dishes, Ben (like the chip off the old block he is) snatched every dirty dish within sight and fed the washing duo as fast as he could.  So, technically, he was not the washer-of-dish but rather the ‘dish fetcher’.  Still, it’s a start.  I was and am very proud.

Little does he know, that the domestication process has just officially begun with the ‘parents-meeting-parents’ dinner.

Poor sap. 

(names withheld by request)

just a question………..?

“…………all men are created equal……..” may be the very cornerstone of Democracy.  One (wo)man, one vote.  In theory, Democracy is egalitarian, fair, humane and representative.  If you read the US Constitution, it is a marvel of equality for the masses and especially so if read in the context of the time in which it was written.  Those founding fathers had vision!

Capitalism, on the other hand, is founded on differences.  The smarter, stronger, taller, faster will ‘get more’ because they contribute more.  The rich will get richer because they have extra capital to invest.  You can compensate for any lack of inherited talents or wealth by working harder or studying more but, no matter how you cut it, it is competitive and the competition rewards the winner.  The rest are losers.

We all may be seen as equal when the first game is played but, by the end of the season, there is only one champion.

How can we reconcile these two seemingly conflicting ideologies?  I dunno.  Maybe somebody can figure that out but not me.  In professional sports, they just start afresh every season.  Voila!  Winners and then – after the year passes – equals. 

Judaism, at least, anticipated the discrepancy and built in a strong influence for getting rich but then having to share those riches later on.  And they had an egalitarian base as well.  It was the Jews who made the Golden rule, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” 

But they have their share of Bernie Madoffs so it is not foolproof.

The Chinese seem more comfortable with conflicting ideas.  Yin and yang are used to describe the dynamic tension between forces.  And the world is full of conflicting energies.  So, maybe there is not supposed to be reconciliation of conflicting founding philosophies.  Maybe we are supposed to careen between ideas.  Maybe confusion is the status quo.  Since I don’t know anything, I may be in the perfect spot!

One thing is true, however: yin and yang are alternatively in ascendancy or descendancy depending on the other at any given time.  The pendulum swings.

And then it swings back.

And, if that is the case, the pendulum seems to have swung too far when one person can earn 57000 times what another can in a given year.  The winner/loser system has gone as far as it can.  It is now time for the egalitarian energies to triumph.  The ‘get rich’ pendulum must be at the height of it’s swing and the ‘share-with-others’ force must be gathering energy to swing the other way.

Could we be on the verge of a revolution and not even know it?

time flies when you are remote

I think I have said this before – we are unfathomably busy!  It makes no sense, really, but it’s true.  Every day is filled.  We finish at night exhausted.  Chores are left undone, e-mails unresponded to, calls not made and dogs not played-with simply because we were too busy at other things.  How is this possible?

When we lived in the city, we did all of that and more and held down full-time jobs, raised two kids and spent more money!  How did we do that?  Hell, we even had more sex back then!

Yesterday we went and fixed our neighbour’s plumbing.  That was good.  John has fixed ours so many times, it was good to be able to reciprocate.  Sal then went over and checked out the neighbour’s cabins.  Then we moved some logs, bathed the dogs, fixed a few more things and did some computer work.  Dinner was almost late.  Then we did some baking (yes, I helped!) and did some more chores and answered some calls and tried to watch a movie.  We finally stopped and did some reading. 

Sal fell asleep while reading but she always does.  She sits there with her head drooped and the book slowly falling until it hits her lap and then, with a start, the book is lifted and the eyes are opened for a few seconds and the cycle repeats for as long as an hour.  She claims to be reading, anyway.  She is even worse if we watch a ‘nature’ show, like David Attenborough or some Discovery Channel thing.  Before the initial credits have rolled, she is unconscious.  “I really like nature shows, I think.  I just can’t stay awake long enough to be really sure!” 

I am half asleep most of the day but not when reading.  When I am reading, I am fully awake but, of course, I am only using one eye (two eyes make it blurred) so maybe that’s it.

Every day we have breakfast and say, “So, what chores have we got planned for today?”   The answers vary from ‘building a new building to trimming the dogs, from cooking a meal to receiving guests, from doing some ‘business’ to working on the old Quonset hut.  And on and on and on.  And on.  The chore list never ends and is increased regularly by things that break or that are new projects. 

Mind you, ‘new’ is a relative term.  The second, lower funicular is the current new project that has been in the planning stage for four years, the purchase-of-materials stage for two and the construction stage for one.  I am barely half-way through.

“What do you do all day when you live on a remote island?  Do you get bored?”  I am never bored.  There is not enough time in every day to get everything done.  There is so much more that I want to do and not enough lifetime left to even read about it.  We are busy every day.   Our plates are full.  Our cups runneth over.  

just a side note

A 60+ year old friend of mine who was one of the volunteers at our Hong Kong school won a scholarship to learn Mandarin in Tianjin, China, a city of 12 million.  It has been quite an experience for her (not in the least because they didn’t know she was 60 when she applied!). She writes:

“I sometimes think I’ve come to the dark side of the moon, or the dust capital of the universe. Tianjin is a huge city of 12 million …… After several frustrating months trying to ensure my success (and probably engineering my own failure), I have come to the realization that westerners are deeply devoted to logic, to process, to goals and (to) facilitation. These are not in the Chinese thought universe. It’s remarkable how many concepts and activities here are directly opposite to western ways…….At the moment I just wish I could get over this chest cold I’ve had for all of December, so I can make the most of (my opportunity). I find the Chinese people friendly here, but this is wildly different from Hong Kong, and not just because it’s perfectly flat here in Tianjin!  Take a few gulps of that clean fresh  BC air for me, it’s precious.”

The ‘differences’ she experiences in Tianjin are on the same scale the students experience when they come to visit us on Read, only the student’s experiences are more positive.  Or so it seems from their comments. 

a bit o’ politics

A really poor person makes or gets, say, $10,000.00 a year (welfare recipient).  A ‘rich’ person earns say, one million ($1,000,000) annually.  Of course there are many more ‘elite’ who make more than that but one has to admit it, $1M a year seems like a pretty good hit for most people.  I’d take it. 

David Hahn, the admiral of our aging ferry fleet makes that and he hasn’t resigned.  It seems adequate for him!  I think one has to accept that $1,000,000 a year is more than enough to live on and even have a bit left over for your RRSP.  Right?  Well, the ratio of income between the two recipients described above is 100 to one.  David Hahn makes 100 times more than what a poor person makes.

You know what?  I don’t care.  Life is full of inequity and unfairness and, even if it were not, some people work harder, do more and are more valuable to the economy than others.  I can accept a disparity of 100 to one.  It’s a bit galling, I suppose, from an idealistic point of view but I have learned to mix a bit of reality into my idealism and I can live with it.

Hell, I am so tolerant that I can accept twice that (200 times) for a good hockey player or Angelina Jolie.

But it turns out the richest of the hedge fund managers makes 50 thousand times what the poor person makes.  Every year!  Seems billionaires  are so rich they can’t reasonably spend the interest off their wealth even if they spent a million dollars a day!  There are now so many of these super-rich that the Forbes Richest 400 list is all billionaires and the lower ranks of billionaires can’t break the 400 mark!

50,000 times more income per year is the greatest disparity in all of history by a huge, huge factor.  Even Marie Antoinette, when advising the revolting French to ‘why not eat cake?’ only had 100 times the income of the poor peasant.  John D Rockefeller never exceeded 300 times.

Another way to look at it: if you count  each second (i.e. 1 – 2 – 3), it will take you twelve days to count to a million.  It will take you 32 years to count to a billion.  It will take you almost 140 years (counting every second) to reach the same number as Jimmy Pattison has in dollars.  And JP is small potatoes.   Real disparity: you can’t live long enough to even count Jimmy’s money!
 
Something has gone out of whack in the ‘fairness’ of it all to be sure but that is not really the issue.  The issue is that dollars – in a capitalist society – replace votes in terms of influence.  When everyone has the same, one vote per person can have some influence in the way things go.  But when one person has 50,000 times the influence of others because of their income, political votes are rendered largely irrelevant.  The voter investing his/her ballot has been effectively marginalized by the ‘new votes’ (dollars).  No wonder the electorate is apathetic.  They ‘feel’ that their vote doesn’t count and it doesn’t.

Add to that globalization and those who now pull the strings are ‘out of reach’ of the revolting peasants.  Remember, the peasants took Marie’s head!  When Britain threatened to ‘punish’ (tax) the excessively rich so-called bankers who helped bring down the global economy (2007/08), the banks simply threatened to leave London and go to Switzerland.  The banks (virtually created and supported by the laws of the nation) are now so big they can thumb their noses at the government who created them!

So, what do you think your provincial vote is worth these days?

Answer:  It is not worth the same Canadian penny they are soon to discontinue.  Your vote ain’t worth squat!  You know why?  Because you are voting to sustain the very same system that makes your vote worthless.

Ironic, isn’t it?

Is there an answer?  Well, there are too many of them to chop off their heads and they have lots and lots of security (haven’t you noticed?) with which to monitor our collective behaviour and mood so it just may be that the battle is lost and the dark side has won.  Sorry, Luke.  The force just wasn’t as strong as we hoped.

And, if that is the case, learn to say ‘yes sir’ to the jackboots of regulation and adjust your tastes and consumptions to that which you can barely afford while you work harder and harder to do it.  You know, like it has been for the past two decades?

I suppose we could all rise in one united voice and vote for a ‘new party’ that promises to end this return to peasantry and slavery but, really, who might that be then?