Slaying dragons one quilt at a time

Sal worked yesterday at the Post Office.  She’s part-time, maybe once a month on average.  Usually, she is pretty laid-back about it.  She mosey’s up to the floating bare, unserviced postal shed in her little boat, chats with customers, sells some stamps, sorts the mail and then comes home.  Four hours.

But yesterday, she was tense.  She was anxious.  She had a straight-lipped-mouth look. THAT is serious stuff right there.  Yesterday was grim.

“Sweetie.  You look grim.  Y’alright?”

“Fine.  Just pressure.  I’ll be fine.”

“What pressure?  It’s mail, fer gawd’s sake.  You can do it in your sleep.”

“It’s not the mail, silly.  Tomorrow I have a quilting class and I have to get up at 6:00 am to make it to the class on time.  AND I am supposed to have done some cutting in advance but my pattern just came Wednesday and it is sooooooooo complicated.  I just don’t know how I am gonna get it all done.  Oh, Gawd!”

“There, there now, Sal, relax.  Reeeee……laaxxxx.  Breathe.  In.  Out.  Breathe.  You can get it handled!  I know you, Sal.  You can do this.  YOU CAN DO THIS THING!  You are good to go girl!  There ain’t nothing you can’t do and they have not invented a pattern you can’t lick or a stamp you can’t sew!”

“What?”

“Never mind.  I am jus’ bein’ supportive which ya’all.  I am on yo’ side.  Whachever you need to hear, girl, that’s what I am sayin’.”

“Why you talkin’ whicha black accent, dawg!?”

“You are right.  Let us stop it!  Stop it right now.  This could get weird fast.”

“You already weird….”

So, she is over at Quilting right now.  She’ll be OK.  Sal handles this kind of pressure well. She cheats.  Actually, it isn’t really cheating, it’s multi-tasking, she says.  “I took the pattern with me to work.  I spread the cloth all over the counter and the boxes.  Had some hanging on the rack.  Some on the stove.  I read the pattern when I had the chance. I really wish we had some light in there.  Thank God the plane was late and we had few customers.  Normally, I might listen to any gossip or even read some of our own mail but, this time, I just cranked it up a notch.  I was the postmistress supreme and the quilter-from-hell!”

“And they put Harriet Tubman on the US 20 dollar bill!  YOU should be on the next Canadian $20.00 bill!”

“Damn straight!”

 

 

Revelation #9

Mike Duffy was found not guilty of all 31 charges.  He is a free man.  He is allowed to return to the Senate and the trough. The legal system has spoken.

But the judge also said something more than just ‘not guilty’.  He said that common sense and the rules of the senate were strangers.  In effect, the judge condemned the senate for the way it conducted it’s business.  In effect, the legal system is broken as well.  But we knew that.

Mind you, the law, justice and common sense are also strangers. The Latimer case proved that. Robert Latimer went to jail for years.  Mike gets paid $142,000 plus non-nonsensical benefits for doing more of nothing.  Who is he going to shill for anyway, now that Harper is gone?

But who said life was fair?

I also read that the top-billing doctor in Ontario (an eye surgeon) cost their taxpayers $6.6 million last year.  Surgeons do not ‘pay’ for the hospital they use nor the staff that assists them.  They don’t pay the cleaners or the power bill.  My guess is that fairness and honesty might be in question there as well.

None of that is news.  I mention it only because some people are more equal than others in our corrupt and faltering system.  It simply cannot continue. And yet it continues.

But it no longer continues for me.  By going ‘off the grid’, we have not fully extricated ourselves from the system but we have somehow ameliorated the effects of the corruption and evil of it.  I have no doubt that, had I remained in the cul de sac, I would be so outraged by so much that passes for ‘the way it is’ that I would either be mental or arrested by now.

So, what’s the point?

Living off the grid is a form of therapy, a way to mental health.  I had no idea that it would turn out that way but I think it has. Of course it has the positive influence of nature, whales, ravens and fresh air but it also insulates me from so much that is wrong with this world and I am just not talking ISIL, Trump and world hunger. I am simply talking about common sense, fairness and goodness on an everyday, neighbourhood level.  We have more of that out here.  It’s that simple.  The ratio of good to evil is just so much better.

I didn’t know that.

 

What…?! Appearances, you say?

Michel Girouard is a judge with the Quebec Superior Court.  He was suspended with pay in 2013 pending a review by three of his peers for allegations that he bought cocaine.  The three have since determined that there was not enough evidence to charge him so they haven’t. They also concluded that Justice Girouard was not a credible witness when testifying on his own behalf.  They said, “If Justice Girouard were to continue as a judge of the Superior Court of Quebec, this would, in our opinion, undermine public confidence in the entire judicial system.”

Several points need to be made here.  One; the alleged offences happened over 25 years ago during the period 1987 – 1991. Two; he was not charged.  So, on the face of it, he should go about his business.

But, when questioned by his peers, he was judged ‘not credible’.  In effect, three of his peers judged him as evasive and not telling the truth.  That might still leave him uncharged and unconvicted but it should at least mean that he is guilty of a level of contempt.  And, as we all know, contempt of court is worse than murder.

Still, it was NOT a court, it was just an investigation.  No proof.  No charges.  No conviction.  Maybe he should be allowed to go about his business?

Or should he?  Don’t forget – there is a basic tenet in law that ‘not only must justice be done, it must be SEEN to be done.  And quickly!  Time is of the essence.  In other words, appearance of process must be as impeccable as process.

Frankly, I do not think there has been the proper standard of appearances in this matter but who the hell am I?  Let us move on to the real issue…

Mr. Girouard has been suspended with pay since January 2013.  I am guessing that his salary is in the neighbourhood of $200K a year but I do not know (I just checked.  I was wrong.  I do not know Marcel’s salary but the average is $350,000 plus a helluva lot of benefits).  I just know that the system does not skimp on paying tax dollars to high ranking civil servants and judges are pretty high up.  So, Mr. Girouard has been paid $1,000,000 (give or take) to sit on his butt.

Compare that to an ordinary person charged with a crime or ‘being investigated’.   DO NOT compare to a senator like Duffy.

And therein lies the issue that concerns me: Canadian justice is slow.  Too slow.  Slower than glaciers (OK, that is partly due to global warming but it is still SLOW).  So the ‘appearance’ of justice in this case is made worse by the time it is taking to essentially do more ‘nothing’.  NOT only is it slow but it is very expensive.  We, the taxpayers are paying for the lethargy of the system and, in this case, that lethargy is actually BENEFITING the accused.  How long does it take for three ‘peers’ to determine if there is enough evidence to make a charge stick?  NOT three years!!!

Mr. Girouard is happy to let the process drag on.  Why not?  He is getting paid.  The peers are happy to go slow.  Why not?  They are getting paid, too.

That it took them 25 years to even allege wrongdoing is stupid enough but that it took three years for three judges to ‘think about’ whether there is a case to be had….that’s ludicrous.

Even stupider?   Their conclusion was tabled to the Federal minister in November.

“The minister thanks the Canadian Judicial Council for their work and she will be reviewing their report,” said Michael Davis, a spokesman for the minister.  

My advice to Girouard: “Book a slow cruise around the world, Marcel.  They won’t be doing much on this.  Not any time soon, anyway!”

Lead Acid batteries and the circle of life

I have 12 8D batteries rated at 200 amp hours each.  They are heavy duty, deep cycle industrial type batteries.  Value….?  New?  Maybe as much as $3600.  I have configured them in three sets of 4.  Four times 12 = 48 volts and that is the system I have, a 48 volt system.  But, when you put four together to make 48 volts, you do not increase your amp hours so I have 3 groups of four to achieve 600 amp hours (3 times 200 amp hours).

For those of you numbing over from boredom already, that information is almost NOT important.  600 ah at 48 volts = 28,800 watts.  You can get 28,800 watts with a 24 volt system (1200 amp hours) or 28,800 watts with a 12 volt system (2400 amp hours).  It all translates to watts and all the watts get ‘inverted’ to 120 volts AC by way of the (duh) inverter.

“We know all this.  You have bored us before with it!”

I know.  And you also know Elon Musk is developing another type of hang-on-the-wall battery that is made from Lithium Ion technology.  It promises to be better.  Someday.

AND more expensive.  Of course.  At least twice.  Maybe more.

My lead acid batteries are ‘rated’ to last as long as 7 years if I am a perfect caretaker.  I am not.  I try.  But I fail.  So, I expect five years and, if I get more, I am ecstatic.  Do the math.  That’s about $1.50 a day in battery depreciation.  Give or take.

I have had these batteries pushing five years already.  So, I am starting to look for batteries again.  My friend, Mike, is in the business.  “Get those Discovery batteries.  I’ll bring them in for ya.”

“Never heard of them!”

“They’ve been around.  Head office in Vancouver.  No idea where they are made but they are the best lead acid batteries available right now.”

“You mean, after Surrette.”

“I think they are comparable.  Maybe a bit cheaper, too.”

“How can that be?”

“Different technology.  Different electrolyte.  Different plates.  But still lead acid.  Best part is that you can draw them down further.  They are deeper cycle.  And they have at least two to three times more cycles in them than do your 8Ds.  That means probably 15 years or more from them.”

So, what is the point?  Well, as you know, we built to the thirty year rule but that was ten years ago.  So, I only have to worry about batteries for twenty more years.  If I get the Discovery batteries in a few years, I may be able to get them to stretch out for the duration.  To hell with Elon Musk.

But, more to the point, folks are out there trying to improve the technology.  It’s about time. Batteries have been the product that was not broke so no one fixed it.  But nowadays we are expecting way more from batteries and so some folks went and fixed it.  I am almost 100% sure that Discovery batteries are a step up.  I am equally as sure that, in five years, there will be a bigger step up.  I will stretch this current batch as far as I can and then ‘make the leap’.

Solar panels got cheaper.  Around $1.25 a watt.  I am thinking of adding three more. Batteries are getting better.  Inverters are already great. Charge controllers are also getting better.  It is only NOW that using solar in even a cul de sac house is starting to make sense.  Almost.  When batteries get a bit better than the Discovery or Surrette models and if they address ‘connectors’ and bits and pieces next, it will definitely be time to consider doing it even if you are NOT off the grid.

I predict that it WILL make enough financial sense to do it in five years if it isn’t already a good idea simply to have ‘black-out’ back-up.

 

 

Survivorman

A couple we now know well came to live here because they read the book.  They were retiring from the prairies anyway and they had pretty much chosen this area but reading the book narrowed their search and, last year, they came to be full-time residents on the island.  They are a great addition to the community and they seem to be loving it.  Last night, they came for dinner.

“You’ll never guess……”

“What?”

“Well, we had some of our prairie friends over last week and, well, they are now looking to buy here, too! The floodgates are open!”

“Four is not a flood.  In fact, in that same time, we lost two.  So, we are net plus two, I think.”

“Good.  But actually, now that we are here, we are already starting to feel as if we should keep the good news of it to a select few.  Don’t want paradise covered in people, do we?”

“Won’t happen.  Twelve years ago one of the local guys warned me off describing hereabouts in glowing terms.  ‘Now, don’t go tellin’ folks how great it is here or they will come and spoil it.’  Since then maybe ten have come and six have left.  We are still an island gathering of 50 on a good day.  Maybe 70 on a good day in August. Two reasons for that; no one reads me and very few can imagine living like this.  I think we are safe.”

“Yeah….funny you should say ‘safe’…….we are kinda gettin’ into that prepper mind-set, ya know?  Kinda wanna stock up on stuff like grains and raise chickens….kinda…..not really….but….kinda, ya know?”

“Oh, yeah.  I know that feeling well.  It will pass.  I used to read about animal husbandry and all that.  If you read a few manuals on getting lambs to breathe after having just been born, you will either become a vegetarian or want all meat disguised in saran wrap like us. Lambs are hard. But so are chickens.  Cows are impossible.  Can you believe that? COWS are impossible!  Who knew?”

“So, like, are we ever gonna be much more independent than two weeks from Save-On?”

“We’re four weeks.”

“Wow!”

“Bought 10 pounds of whole powdered milk powder when last in the city.  We could maybe go two months now that we have powder for tea.”

“Wow!  You guys are amazing!”

“I know.  Feel like Les Stroud.”

“But, like, is that really it?  I mean, shouldn’t we do gardens and chickens and gather roots, nuts and twigs and all that crap?”

“Some do.  L picks her pharmacy right out of the forest.  R picks 100 pounds of wild blackberries for the best damn wine every year.  But I think he likes Quaker Harvest Crunch cereal so you win some, you lose some. J catches a few pounds of prawns in season but then gives them as gifts to his neighbours in town.  They might buy him a pizza in return, ya know?  Pizza…the circle of life kinda thing?”

“So, how much of your diet do you make, find or forage?”

“Sal cooks from scratch so, if you are counting processing, we eat nothing heavily processed.  Not really.  But, if you are counting grains and spices and dairy and cheese and scotch and chocolate and comparing that to what we actually grow or catch, I am guessing maybe ten percent.  Fifteen in the summer.”

“That is not very independent.”

“I know.  But Les Stroud got rich off of Survivorman.  Wanna know what he does with the money?  Eats at Hy’s Steakhouse, that’s what.  Les ate roots and bugs for the TV show but eats cheeseburgers between scenes.  That’s the real secret to Survivorman.”

 

 

Jus’ thinkin’

Interesting twist to the Canadian economy, don’t you think?  The Harper-cons were so petro-oriented and, then of course, the price of crude dropped and the economy tanked. Just-in Trudeau wins the election with a smile and a positive message and, in a short time, Canada’s image abroad improves, our popularity improves and – HOLY COW! – our economy improves.  Oil is still down and yet the economy is up.  One would think we were exporting smiles and hope rather than oil.

It’s not that simple, of course, but in some ways, it is.  That Trudeau has changed the mood of the country is undeniable and that the mood of the country is the largest driver of the economy is well-known.  Oil only represents a very small percentage of GDP.  Hope and goodwill seems to be much more influential.  Canadians are more upbeat.  And ‘upbeat’ is a strong economic driver rather than the other way around.

The devalued dollar makes our goods easier to sell overseas.  I know that.  A booming manufacturing sector is really just another way of saying ‘DISCOUNT PRICES!’  So the lower loonie is probably a more real ‘metric’ indicator.  Still, the change in the air is palpable. Trudeau has turned Gloomy Gus into Jolly Joe Six-pack.  And, somehow, that is working in ways previously unseen.  Message to business: see the extra special response to ‘going good’ and ‘delivering hope’ that is way more productive than cutting costs and jobs and wages and preaching doom.

But I don’t wanna gloat about the past and present.  I really want to look at what it means to us in the future.  I was NOT impressed with Trudeau and still resent, to some extent, a pretty face and a famous name gaining him our top office.  Feels wrong to me.  I will continue to look for that kind of superficiality in his character that I saw when he gave the eulogy to his father. But there is no doubt that he is currently batting 1.000.  So far, the guy has done good.  It would be churlish not to admit it.  As of this date, I have no complaints and only praise.  He is well on his way to proving me wrong.  And I admit it freely.

Still, let us look for a minute at what constitutes success in the future….

I don’t know.

Is it just numbers?  Is the GDP the brass ring?  Money, money, money?

Is it Canadian unity?  If we all love one another, First Nations, French Canadians, Muslims, Jews and Wasps…throw in some Syrians for spice…is that the measure?

Is it simply surviving climate change?

Maybe we are to embrace Bhutan as our model and strive for Gross Domestic Happiness? (Concept. Gross National Happiness is a term coined by His Majesty the Fourth King of Bhutan, Jigme Singye Wangchuck in the 1970s. The concept implies that sustainable development should take a holistic approach towards notions of progress and give equal importance to non-economic aspects of wellbeing.)

But how do you strive for an enlightened state like that in a Capitalistic culture?  Especially a corrupt Capitalist culture?  How, in fact, do you even reconcile a cheap B flick shoot-em-up washed down with scotch in a Gross Happiness culture?  Sounds counter-intuitive, don’t you think?

Anyway….the world’s progress engine is going into ‘stall’ mode.  That much is clear.  So, if monetary progress is halted or at least slowed, what does that do the collective psyche?   Methinks technology and more massive migrations will ameliorate that effect to a large extent in some places (like the Chinese exodus of the rich to Vancouver BC) but the rich will likely get richer and the masses more redundant and revolting – in every sense of the word.  What to do with the masses?

Growth, as a sustainable concept, was never viable and it is finally showing up. Jeff Rubin is proving to be right (The End of Growth).  This may be the new future.  The rich got what they wanted…and, so, now what do the rest of the rabble do?

 

I have been away…

…and now I am back.

Went to Vancouver to help out a friend. Stayed a week.  And I got a little caught up in the ‘business’ of it all and could feel the lure of the place again.  Money was offered.  Jobs were offered. Friends gave greetings. Challenges presented up.  I actually felt the thrill of it again.  Whoa, Nellie!

By the time I pulled my head out of the thick of it at the end of the week, I was neck deep in negotiation, strategizing, planning, math, execution, business models…..and I couldn’t stop, actually.  Thinking.  Thinking.  Thinking.  Ooooooohhhhhhh….it was goooooood.

It was fun, actually.  I enjoyed it.

But I was also exhausted.  And, like many town take-aways, I got a head-cold and that was plugging up my brain.  I was completely ‘done’ by the end of the day.  After a week, I realized that I could not keep this kind of pace going.  Nor did I want to.  It was fun while it lasted.  But it was over.  “Thanks for the offers but the answer is no.  I would start falling asleep in meetings by week three and you’d regret making the offer.  By week five, I would die from a jammer and, in so doing, I would regret taking the offer.  I see only disappointment here for all of us. Only Sal can see an upside….buying more shoes and maybe taking that mourning-widow cruise she has been planning a little sooner rather than later. ” 

So, I am back after having done my best to mess things up for as many people as I could.

It is good to be home.

 

Smartest man in the world

His name is Howard.  He’s the smartest man the world.  I have known him for pushing 35 years and usually, when we get together, I just sit in awe and listen.  Occasionally, I chime in only to regret it a minute later while he recites the law, the Magna Carta or the Canadian Constitution as if it were as common as when we used to quote Chandler Bing on Friends.

But smart has never really been defined by me as knowing details, facts, history, technology or anything academic.  Not really.  To me, most top academics were so universally inept at so many things, it was simply not possible to attribute any real intelligence to them regardless of their grasp of psychiatry, macro economics, physics or even history.  If you can’t work a doorknob or drive a car properly, you simply can’t possibly be all that smart.

Howard doesn’t drive.  No one will let him.  He’s THAT bad a driver, it seems.  But he STILL registers as the smartest man I ever met!  So that gives you some idea of how smart he is.  I judge everyone else in the world by how well they drive.  He’s exempt from that.  The guy is a guru.  The quintessential, non-handy, non-driving professor who can tell you more about anything than you thought possible.  Any topic!

And he is smart in a practical way when he wants to be.  In anything.  If he needs money, he just goes and ‘makes’ a million or two so that he can go back to doing what he loves.  If he wants to impact the world in some way, he just does it.   And he writes.  He saves refugees these days and then he writes some more.  Sometimes he will clean. Seems he is allowed to clean house now and then.  Other than that mini-hobby, he is pretty much a thinker-guy, a writer-guy.

I once hosted a piece from him on my blog.  You may recall….?

I also mentioned to him that I had written to an ex-US president some years back but got no response. “You missed nothing. Stupidest man I ever met – given his position.  I was there once with him for four days.  Mind numbing!”

“I spoke with him/her/them and………….”  It is a common phrase to start a conversation with for Howard.  Congress, the senate, the Knesset, the PM, the president, corporate heads…….it’s just boggling.  I stopped asking him about various famous people and places because, after awhile, I was too stunned to hear the answer.

Is he really the smartest man in the world?  He is definitely the smartest in my world.  By a HUGE margin.  So huge, it is scary.  But the thing that makes us friends is that he is a also a good guy.  Always does the right thing.  This is a guy who has moral and ethical and goodness down pat.  He’s a rock.  If you ever get in that space where you think the world is going to hell in a handbasket, you should be so lucky as to have a ‘Howard’ to talk to.

He smiles and laughs as he tells you stuff you didn’t know you didn’t know.  You come away from that not knowing MORE stuff so much as knowing that whatever you are feeling or thinking, whatever mood or fear you have, whatever worry or concern is troubling you, it is based on totally incomplete information.  You are worrying based on 5% knowledge.  Howard knows 80% of that topic (any topic) and he is still smiling.

May as well not worry.

 

All wars endure. Especially this one.

The second in a very short series of provocative topics

We are animals first.  Our motivations, our fears, our basic instincts are all still very primal. We want our genes in the gene-pool, we want to survive and we all want full stomachs. Eat, sleep and screw is still job 1.

Our modern way of following that destiny is now so complicated and so sophisticated that it requires massive social cooperation.  We now need cities, institutions, corporations, NGOs and governments just to make the simple basics happen.  We need Facebook. We have complicated the simple.

So, we are a social species, one that generally works together when it works.  If it works at all.

And, of course, you know all this.

Social species tend towards specialization and we are no different.  In fact, possibly one of the most vulnerable aspects of our own modern life right now is that we may be too specialized in some ways. Not enough people can do enough general-skill-set things to basically survive on their own for more than even a few days and that makes us all weaker to a large extent.  The species is vulnerable to it.  But, I digress.

The point is that we have bred/evolved/specialized men, in particular, to be more manly and we have done the same to woman to be more womanly.  Sexually, anyway.  In our quest for specialization, we have managed to separate the sexes even further and enhance their differences rather than their commonality.  We have ‘differentiated’ them more than they were already and naturally because of nature’s own natural selection, basic evolution and genetic experimentation.  We have bred sheep, cattle, dogs and fowl to be ‘more’ than they were originally and we did the same to ourselves.  In other words, we have always been inclined to being different in the sexes but society and civilization have exaggerated it.

That differentiation served us well for a long time, actually. The male of the species was bred like a pit bull to be an aggressive fighter for a considerable time.  And we encouraged that for village and town defense.  We, the people, wanted them (our soldiers) bigger, meaner, smarter, more aggressive and vicious than those annoying ‘enemies’ we might have across the way.  We want the really tough guys on our side.  If they are aggressive and greedy, that’s not so bad either.  Especially if they raid the other village and bring back the bacon and goodies for their own village.  Go, tough guys!

We even mentally enhanced our males to be more ‘manly’ by way of propaganda movies starring Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham and Bruce Willis.  These guys are tough and invincible AND funny.  What’s not to like?  Go Bruce!

We have further enhanced them with sophisticated martial arts and physical skills training, drugs, extra-hormones, weaponry and by fear-mongering and ‘dissing’ the ‘enemy’.  We reward them when they get that way.  We then take those testosterone-freaks and train them in real death situations in Afghanistan, Iraq, local police forces, armed forces and various other but always-happening hot spots around the world.  Maybe just the local gym. And, if some of our young men are NOT going to a war, they might be encouraged, at least, to play in the mock wars of hockey, football and martial arts.  And we reward them extra for that!

Make no mistake, we encourage our males to ‘man up’.

Why?  Because much of the time we want them to be able to kill, dominate, take and protect.  We want them to be able to beat others up.  We want them to be brutal and decisive and we want them to win as much gold, bacon, babes, real estate and power as they can.  We like men who ‘take what they want’.  So long as they are doing it for us.

And women then want them to give all that wealth obtained by whatever means to them. Someone has to get it all…for the kids….for the species…right?

We have not left our women short in the field of enhancements, evolution, motivations and agendas, either.  They are good at what they do.  They do not have to kill and fight but they should at least be beautiful, seductive and manipulative.  Add silicon if needed. Always add make-up.  They should NOT work hard if it ruins their figure.  They should be physically powerful but so much more mentally powerful that they can control their men. They need to control and discipline their men to avoid trouble back at home.

The modern successful women has it all, a massive bank account, a monster house, a monster husband who brings home the goodies and then he shuts the hell up and watches sports while she gets a massage and manicure and invests the family estate in getting even more money accumulated.  It’s called ‘progress’.

And people wonder why that formula so often goes off the rails.

We all know that it is not a good, healthy, peaceful or sustainable formula.  But it is what we made it and we are playing it.

“So, what is your point, Dave?”

You can’t breed and encourage an animal to be a pit bull and not expect that he will fight and/or bite someone.  It’s now a built-in part of the beast.  You can’t encourage the male human animal by having the female being attracted to them for being so aggressive and not expect that some of the beast will come along for the ride.  Maybe show up now and then back at the condo? To do so is naive.

One of the reasons women are so angry at aggressive and ‘driven’ men is that they WANT that aggressive man to use that ‘power’ to protect them and fill their larder with goodies.  But they do not want to deal with the fact that, for many men, the women are sometimes seen as the ‘stuff and the goodies’.  Getting the babe is part of the reward system because we have also merchandised sex.

And that profession started a long time ago.

Face it, when you silicon and pout yourself up, you are merchandising yourself as a goody.  You are ‘part’ of the larder.  And, when you package yourself up as ‘marketable stuff’, then primal guy is gonna occasionally bite the wrong leg.

Bottom line: we are sending men and women mixed and ultimately self-destructive messages. It maybe worked in the past.  It does not work now.  Be good.  Be successful. Be primal.  Be polite.  And do as you are told is a fantasy expectation.

For reasons no longer applicable, we are still pushing men and women to being caricatures of real human beings and values.  Beauty and the beast.  And we will likely continue to do that because it is good for that new sociopathic species, it is good for business.   And men and women will continue to disappoint one another in real and human ways.  And that is sad because we do not want to be used by corporate guy and we all really want more than primal relationships with our partners.

In the meantime, sex crimes will continue. Sexual politics will continue.   The war of the sexes will continue.

The truly tragic part of it is that we don’t acknowledge the natural differences between the sexes and deal with them.  We don’t accept the basic animal urges as natural.  We don’t address any of that in a healthy way. We just fight about it.  Like the animals we still are.

Fool me once, shame on Jian. Fool me twice and I am the fool.

Sexual politics is a tar-baby.  Shouldn’t be touched.  I know that.  I have just pulled the pin on a hand grenade…

For the record: I do not like – in any way – Jian Ghomeshi.  Didn’t like his personality, didn’t like the CBC show and I was particularly put off with what he allegedly offered up as seductive foreplay for his groupie-like dates.  Not my kind of guy at all.

Well, it was not just alleged, actually, the weird behaviour was admitted by him as well. Doesn’t make it any better.  The guy is some kind of bully, doing silly, immature power-displays over his surprised and intimidated dates.

I have a tendency to want to punch people like that.  Forgive me.  I carry a bias of chivalry. Or chauvinism, if you prefer.  I think I am coming to the rescue. You know, fair maidens in danger…?  That kinda thing?  Disney-esque?  

It seems I am judged wrong to feel that way these days.  “I can take care of myself!” is the fashionable female response even if the opposite is obviously true.  (I once saw a guy meanly manhandling and yelling viciously at a much smaller woman and so I politely intervened.  No punching!  After the guy left, she told me that she was totally capable of handling it and I should not have interfered.  I apologized and blamed the superhero comic books I read as a kid.  Hard to know what the right thing is sometimes).       

And it is also NOT fashionable to judge sexual practices these days either unless you represent a women’s organization and then it’s OK just so long as the bottom line is that all men are still all bad all of the time!  Seems some men don’t behave as they should. Who knew?  But, regardless, I am inclined to think anything that whacked-out weird is still really NOT OK. So, I judge, too. And I judge JG as a bully.  A punk, really.

Mind you, I have some minor judgments forming about the women who date him, too.  So, I am bad all-around, I guess.  It is really me who is at fault.

Sorry.

I have to keep my mouth shut over most of it, though, on the assumption all the weirdos are simply just different and can’t help it.  And it is all OK.  Apparently all 50 shades of deviation are OK except judging it.  And, oddly, there is nothing wrong with that topsy-turvy way of seeing things.

Nowadays, it is OK for some Dominatrix to whip a willing-someone into submission but for me to judge that behaviour as sick, is not OK.  So, once again, I am bad and it is really me who is at fault.

Sorry.

And, anyway, I have already judged that Ghomeshi could help it.  Apologies to all the ‘chokers and slappers’ out there just expressing themselves naturally.

But – and here’s my point –  so could the victims have helped it.  SO COULD THE VICTIMS!

Of course, they could have had a much better response than they did at the time of the incident but I fully understand the moment of shock and surprise eliminating immediate rational thought.  I understand that seeing a guy ‘turn’ on you like that would be so shocking as to leave one helpless and traumatized.  Maybe even semi-paralyzed for awhile.  In fact, NOT immediately calling the cops makes a great deal of sense to me. Examining your own role in the matter first makes even more sense to me.  “Geez, what did I do to warrant that?”  Not making accusations is probably healthy. You first have to try to understand the something weird that is determined (eventually) NOT understandable.

I get that. Take your time.  Get your head together.

Hint: first question to consider asking yourself, “What the hell was I doing there, in the first place?”

But I also admit that there are many much bigger questions that arise from such a weird incident and the weirdo should do most of the answering.  That first personal question still counts but the next ten or so should be directed at the weirdo.

However, it makes no sense to me to THEN later go on another date with such a person! Simply by doing that, you have implied forgiveness of the original incident if not acceptance.   ‘You were really, really sick, bad and evil but I forgive you.  Be good from now on, OK, my cuddly-dums?’

That almost makes some kind of sense, too, if you are the naive, forgiving type without a brain in your head.  But even the wooden-headed should know that they can’t THEN later charge the dufus with a crime!  Charging the dufus comes BEFORE the second date!

And there should be NO second date.

You are – Ms Woodenhead – by your actions, at the very least, forgiving him his wayward kinks if you go back for a return engagement.  In fact, one might argue that you were inviting more of the same bad behaviour simply by recreating the opportunity.  Don’t you see that?

Doesn’t matter if you do or don’t. Forgiveness makes it consensual.  Sick but consensual. No charges.  No crime committed.

But the charges were laid anyway.  And, oddly, I don’t really have too much trouble with that, either.  Not really.  It was stupid of the Crown.  But, so what?  The system ain’t perfect or fair and it is the accused who gets smashed all to pieces from the allegation, anyway. Allegations are good enough to ruin someone these days.  OBVIOUSLY not all people charged with a crime are guilty but all men are all-guilty of all-sex crimes, it seems.

And that is another hot topic to address some day….

The point: sexual politics has shifted the basic principles of law.  And perspectives. Women think the law no longer cares about them.  Men think the law no longer cares about the male.  He feels he is simply guilty until proven innocent now.  She feels like a target.  Neither are relying on evidence-based processes anymore.

In fact, any woman can allege her husband hit her and the police – without any evidence present, nor questions asked – will take him to jail.  It is Ministry of the Attorney General policy nowadays.  So, that twisted process has to play out.  I think that is wrong, too, but why not at least let it play out?

Women think it plays out but to the advantage of the male.  Men think otherwise.

So, lay the charges, prove the allegation.  Or not. That’s life. Who cares?  Move on.  But, in this, the Ghomeshi case, at least, the evidence was weak, the accusers were proved to be lying.  Ugly, deviant, bully-man got off.  But there is no doubt in my mind, the legal verdict was just.

The court of public opinion will likely find differently.

End result?  Ghomeshi is largely finished as a conventional personality.  Or should be, anyway. We’ll see if he doesn’t yet work his personal madness into a new form of celebrity and make a deal for a show on the FOX network.  Maybe him and Kim Kardashian?  

And there would be nothing wrong with that!   

The public have also called the judge and the law into question. Fair enough, I guess. Justice is a spectator sport, after all.  By design, too. But how can they cry ‘injustice’ when the accusers were proved to be lying?

Answer from women’s groups: ‘Lying is OK, if the original story, in some form, is true enough for our standards?’

Not only is there something significantly wrong with Mr. Ghomeshi, there is something even more wrong with the perspective of women’s rights and political groups if they are prepared to abandon the legal principles on which our society is based.

Jus’ sayin’….