Not worthy

As you can imagine, I am a smidge obsessed with me.  Well, my blog, anyway.

I originally took it on as a discipline in writing and, tho it was not intended to be a book (it was supposed to be just an exercise), I am also a smidge lazy and it seemed that writing for exercise only is like hiking and paddling just to hike and paddle….no real point (see previous blog).  So, after a few blogs hit the ether, I was trying to tie them together in some way so that there might be a theme or a story.

Seems I have failed.  I have reams of words but no real theme, no story-line.

If you have read any number of them, you’ll have noticed that I have a strong tendency to wander off topic – the topic being, presumably, living off the grid.  Worse, there seems to be a problem with having a topic, a main theme, a story in the first place.  Living off the grid is not really a story.  So far, my story is just one of a guy enjoying his life. Off the grid, to be sure but like, it is describing paint drying, isn’t it?

Sadly, there is no crime, no mystery, no car chases and no sex to weave into the narrative.  Well, there may be some of that but I am not at liberty to say.  Sensibilities demand decorum and discretion.  No ‘real life’ permitted, don’t you know?.

Which tends to present as if I live exclusively off building projects and the antics of orcas and ravens.

Not only do I seem to focus on sheds, birds and sea-going mammals, I tend to go off on unrelated tangents like politics and, well, this type of self-indulgent entry.   I seem to be wandering from a fleeting main focus (say, shed building) without actually having a larger main focus (fact: shed building does NOT a story make!).  I find this disturbing.  I mean, really!  After all this time and effort, you would think I would have something consistent to say about something…other than sheds, ravens and orcas, wouldn’t you?

Sally has made it pretty clear that politics isn’t it.  She has been culling the political pieces and putting them in a file carefully marked ‘to be deleted’.  Sadly, there is also a file titled: ‘likely to be deleted’ and another one: ‘saved but not useable’.  There’s ‘Doubtful’, ‘Maybe’ and ‘No way!’ as well.  She’s ruthless.  Put more succinctly, no political pieces will survive the editor’s cut.

Character sketches of local people are also off-limits.  Seems the consensus is (you know how consensus is achieved, right?) that describing locals as they really are is to invite shunning and stoning at the very least. Might make book club a bit awkward.  So, ergo, we have the highest concentration of characters and whack-jobs this side of the Rockies and I have to keep my mouth shut.  How do you do character development without characters?

To be fair, there is not much in the way of developing character going on, anyway.  Our neighbours are just plain nuts and they are staying that way.  It is not likely to change any time soon.  So you would have lots of character description and then, several chapters later, they would all still be the same.  Like a sit-com, actually.

I have been looking at off-the-grid-type books and they are, generally speaking, pretty pathetic.  One author defined off-the-grid as basically down, out and eccentric.  He had chapters dedicated to people living in their cars or abandoned buses, for instance.  Not quite what I would have described.

Then there are those who seem to confuse off-the-grid with saintly altruism of the eco-organic-recycling-bicycling world.  They might live down a main highway and turn off down a paved side road and enjoy piped-in water and electricity but they have solar panels, eat local and compost their own waste or whatever.  Maybe a chicken or two.  Interesting, I suppose, in a Walter-Mitty-goes-to-the-country kind of way but again, not quite what I would describe.

The real off-the-gridders (in my opinion) are really hardy and quite remarkable.  Way more so than we who attend yoga, book-club and Costco.  Read Chris Czajkowski:  She is off the grid.  Those are the books to write.



3 thoughts on “Not worthy

  1. Your writing is grotesque! Grotesque meaning fantastic in its shaping and combination of forms, as in combining incongruous humans, animals and the banal in a melange or mix of disparate narratives containing or composed of dissimilar or opposing elements. Those things that are about to be heaved/deleted/chucked are your best writing. There is a hugh well of discontent out there…so vent it. Those cutsie elements you despise to write about are winners. (Think of Grey Owl, an off the grid kindred spirit.) I know you are conflicted about your audience which you appear to envision as retired boomer dinks(double income no kids) drained of adventure. Keep your shoulder to the wheel and do not chuck anything!


  2. Agree with above commenter. Gotta say I look forward to see what you are going to write about, read it, check back in case you added a picture later (as you just did with the Kayak post, thank you). DO NOT STOP writing.


  3. Well, thanks. You are both encouraging. And I appreciate the feedback. Kinda NEED it actually to help find the ‘glue’ to stick all the posts together into a single story line. Or theme, anyway. I am starting to think the main thread is two older people doing a radical change in lifestyle which – in this case – was off-the-gridding but which could be anything. Some older people get into community, others get into RVíng or travel the world and some even sail around the world. Perhaps this is just another manifestation of life going through phases……..?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.